Conociendo la tendencia electoral de un candidato a través de Facebook: un caso de estudio en las elecciones municipales en Miahuatlán de Porfirio Díaz, Oaxaca
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30973/progmat/2016.8.2/2Palabras clave:
Campañas digitales, campañas electorales, Internet, sitios de redes sociales, tendencia electoralResumen
A raíz de la popularidad de los sitios de redes sociales en diversas campañas electorales, alrededor del mundo, se han realizado dos tipos de estudios: 1) identificar el efecto en la población y 2) conocer la tendencia electoral. En el presente artículo de investigación, se busca conocer la relación que existe entre las propuestas con un resultado electoral en México. Por lo tanto, se han recolectado datos de la cuenta de cuatro usuarios de Facebook que fueron candidatos en la elección 2013 a la presidencia municipal de Miahuatlán de Porfirio Díaz, y se han analizado considerando las siguientes variables: número de amigos, número de mensajes publicados y número de mensajes compartidos por amigos. Los resultados demuestran que los votos obtenidos tienen una correlación positiva con el número de amigos en Facebook.
Citas
Perlmutter, D. D. Blogwars, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Vergeer, M., Hermans, L. Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and Online Social Networking as Campaign Tools in the 2010 General Elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2013, 18(4), 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12023
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., Welpe, I. M. Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment. presented at 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2010.
Ceron, A., Curini, L., Iacus, S. M., Porro, G. Every Tweet Counts? How Sentimental Analysis of Social Media can Improve Our Knowledge of Citizens’ Political Preferences with an Application to Italy and France. New Media & Society, 2014, 16(2), 340-358. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444813480466
Lawson-Borders, G., Kirk, R. Blogs in Campaign Communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 2005, 49(4), 548-559. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0002764205279425
B. Bimber and R. Davis, Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Aparaschivei, P. A. The Use of New Media in Electoral Campaigns: Analysis on the Use of Blogs, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube in the 2009 Romanian Presidential Campaign. Journal of Media Research, 2011, 4(2), 39-60.
Baumgartner, J. C., Morris, J. S. MyFaceTube Politics: Social Networking Web Sites and Political Engagement of Young Adults. Social Science Computer Review, 2010, 28(1), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0894439309334325
Abejon, P., Sastre, A., Linares, V. Facebook y Twitter en Campañas Electorales en España. Anuario Electrónico de Estudios en Comunicación Social, 2012, 5(1), 129-159.
Hanson, G., Haridakis, P. M., Cunningham, A. W., Sharma, R., Ponder, J. D. The 2008 presidential campaign: Political cynicism in the age of Facebook, MySpace, and Youtube. Mass Communication and Society, 2010, 13(5), 584-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.513470
Larsson, A. O., Moe, H. Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 2012, 14(5), 729-747. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444811422894
Zywica, J., Danowski, J. The Faces of Facebookers: Investigating Social Enhancement and Social Compensation Hypotheses; Predicting Facebook and Offline Popularity From Sociability and Self- Esteem, and Mapping the Meanings of Popularity with Semantic Networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2008, 14(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01429.x
Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook “friends”. Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007, 12(2007), 1143-1168.
Donath, J., Boyd, D. Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 2004, 22(4), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc
Tong, S. T., Der, B. V. Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2008, 13(3), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x
Gibson, R. K. Web Campaigning from a Global Perspective. Asia-Pacific Review, 2004, 11(1), 95-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439000410001687779
Kerbel, M. R., Bloom, J. D. Blog for America and Civic Involvement. Press/Politics, 2005, 10(4), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1081180X05281395
Williams, A. P., Trammell, K. D. Candidate Campaign E-Mail Messages in the Presidential Election 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0002764205279438
Meraz, S. Blogging, citizenship, and the future of media. New York: Routledge, 2007.
Sweetser Trammell, K. D. Candidate Campaign Blogs: Directly Reaching Out to the Youth Vote. American Behavioral Scientist, 2007, 50(9), 1255-1263. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0002764207300052
Kaye, B. K., Johnson, T. J. A Web for All Reasons: Uses and Gratifications of Internet Resources for Political Information. Telematics and Informatics, 2004, 21(3), 197-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5853(03)00037-6
Coleman, S., Moss, G. Governing at a distance - politicians in the blogosphere. Information Polity, 2008, 13(1-2), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2008-0142
Farrell, H., Drezner, D. The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice, 2008, 134(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9198-1
Gulati, G. J., Williams, C. B. Social Media and Campaign 2012: Developments and Trends for Facebook Adoption. Social Science Computer Review, 2013, 31(5), 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0894439313489258
Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of innovations, New York: Free Press, 2003.
Carlson, T., Strandberg, K. Riding the Web 2.0 Wave: Candidates on YouTube in the 2007 Finnish National Elections. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 2008, 5(2), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680802291475
Gibson, R. K., McAllister, I. Do Online Election Campaigns Win Votes? The 2007 Australian “YouTube” Election. Political Communication, 2011, 28(2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.568042
Dader, J. L. y Cheng, L. Análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo de las webs de partidos: Editorial Complutense, 2011, 129-140.
Joinson, A. N. Understanding the psychology of Internet behaviour. Virtual worlds, real lives: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Wolfe, R. N., Lennox, R. D., Cutler, B. L. Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50(2), 356-361. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.356
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., Kee, K. F. Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2009, 14(4), 875-901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
Jacobson, D. Impression formation in cyberspace: online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1999, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00333.x
Kleck, C. A., Reese, C. A., Behnken, D. Z., Sundar, S. S. The company you keep and the image you project: Putting your best face forward in online social networks. presented at 57th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Creating Communication: Content, Control, Critique, 2007.
White, J. The Relationship Between Profiles and Perceived Popularity Online. presented at COMM 501, 2005.
IEEPCO, “Resultados municipales 2013,” Instituto Estatal Electoral y de Participación Ciudadana de Oaxaca, Oaxaca 2013.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2016 Programación Matemática y Software
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Usted es libre de:
Compartir — compartir y redistribuir el material publicado en cualquier medio o formato. |
Adaptar — combinar, transformar y construir sobre el material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente. |
Bajo las siguientes condiciones:
Atribución — Debe otorgar el crédito correspondiente, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciador lo respalda a usted o a su uso. |
Sin restricciones adicionales: no puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros a hacer cualquier cosa que permita la licencia. |