Collaborative Learning to teach set theory to engineering students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30973/progmat/2018.10.3/2Keywords:
Set Theory, digital logic, TTL circuits, collaborative educationAbstract
We design a new method for teach set theory for engineer students and computer science engineer, this method is based in collaborative education where the student make a team and each member have a different role. Each team is divided in three students called the“checker”, the“modeler”and the“builder”. The first step is to build equivalence between the basic concepts of the set theory like union, intersection and complement with the digital logic basic concepts like disyunction, conjunction and negation. Later, the students analyze a set theory problem making the digital logic equivalent(made for all “checkers”); the “modelers” design the truth table with all the possibilities, in this table they have the combination of true or false values. Finally, the “builders” build the equivalent circuit using logic TTL gates and on the breadboard make the result using all information obtained by a team (checker, modeler and builder); the team can model problems of the set theory using digital logic. This method was used to teach set theory to computer system engineering and biotechnology engineering students, they have a better knowledge ofthis area ofthe mathematics.
References
Johnson D. W., Cooperative learning, Book Learner-Centered Institution, pp. 4-16, 1998.
Johnson P. A., Problem based, cooperative learning in the engineering classroom, Journal of Professional Issues on Engineering Education and Practice, pp. 8-11, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1999)125:1(8)
Scott N., et al. Engineering education is problem based or project based learning the answer?, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 2-16, 2003.
Jesiek B., Beddoes K., Borrego M., Advancing Global Capacity for Engineering Education Research (AGCEER): Relating Research to practice, policy and industry, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 107-119, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01048.x
Reeves T., Laffey J., Design, assessment, and evaluation of a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate engineering, Higher Education Research and Development Journal, pp. 219-232, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180205
Lima R., et al. A case study project led education in engineering: students’ and teachers’ perceptions, European Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 337-347, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701278599
Woods D.R., Issues in implementation in an otherwise conventional programme. Kogan London. 1997.
Woods D.R., Developing problem solving skills: The McMaster problem solving program, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 75-91, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00270.x
Woods D.R., The future of engineering education III. Developing critical skills, Chemical Engineering Education, pp. 108-117, 2000.
Susanna S., Discrete Mathematics and its applications. Mc Graw-Hill Science. 2011.
Stoll R. R., Set theory and logic. Dover books on mathematics, 1979.
Suppes P., Axiomatic set theory. Dover books on mathematics, 1972.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Programación Matemática y Software
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
Compartir — compartir y redistribuir el material publicado en cualquier medio o formato. |
Adaptar — combinar, transformar y construir sobre el material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente. |
Bajo las siguientes condiciones:
Atribución — Debe otorgar el crédito correspondiente, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciador lo respalda a usted o a su uso. |
Sin restricciones adicionales: no puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros a hacer cualquier cosa que permita la licencia. |